big weekend.
missed the team ride on saturday. it looked like it was going to rain, so i bailed. made a nice breakfast and went out shopping and what not. we had company coming for dinner. still haven't put the apartment together. we started putting up decorations and what not. bought a tv too. costco. good stuff.
went to the seahawks game last night. never been to a pro football game before. pretty awesome. we were about 18 rows up, at the 35 yard line. ah yeah. brother andre hooked me up with the tickets. right on andre. went with cousin will. right on will.
i think my favorite part was when the houston kicker had the chance to be the hero. see, the kicker, he isn't a football player. he just happens to be good at something the rest of those guys aren't good at. so they kick and hope to all hell that the returning guy doen't make it through all the rest of the big guys. cause if he does, then the kicker has to be a football player. and when you're there to kick, that really sucks. so anyway, the kicker kicks and the whole bunch of guys charges down field at all the big guys from the other team who are charging at them. the kicker kinda half ass jogs down the field dancing from side to side according to where the returning dude is headed. all the while, you know he's just hoping that one of his big dudes takes him out. but this seahawks returner guy is stuborn and keeps coming at him. yeah, well the returning guy fumbled and that goofy pointy ball starts bouncing right to the kicker. i've been watching him this whole time, so i see what's going to happen and i start yelling "go kicker guy, go kicker guy" (people look at me funny). well, he runs up to pick it up but he blows it and it bounces off him goes bouncing all funny like footballs do toward some other hapless guy. i love watching those guys try to pin down a football. who knows where it's going to go. ha ha! terry buchanan played football. it was a football injury that brought him to cycling.
pro sports kinda bother me. market forces gone so wrong. athletes, stadiums, networks. so much money going into the sport while teachers and schools go without. homeless folks sleeping in parks. to think of it in marxist terms, what professional athletes produce cannot possibly be on par with that of teachers, homemakers, scientists, etc. but who's gonna pay to watch them do that? the money we spend on entertaining ourselves is phenomenal. so, sports sell. the consumer is willing to spend money and time to watch professional athletic events, so the sponsors spend the money. it all spirals out of control and we have the current situation. it seems so wrong, but what are you going to do about? everytime you buy a coke, pepsi or nike product, you are supporting the system. is it even possible to opt out? not really. in a lot of ways, it really comes down to greed. as a civil society, we count on the haves to kick a little something down to the have nots. its only moral, right? some folks don't think so. what's theirs is theirs. they're happy to be interconnected when it serves them. did they go to public schools? who paid for those stadiums? do they drive the roads that we all pay for? the police? so many (way out there) conservatives want to return everything to the markets. security, roads, utilities. there are places like that. its called the third world. don't work too well, really. the rich have private security and the poor are fucked. how's the middle class gonna build up if there isn't proper security and all that? hell, india had a public power company that enron and mr clinton shut down in favor of the promise of more efficient private providers. yeah, well prices went up many hundreds of percent and the people had no control. how well does that work for development? not so well. so anyway, pro sports bug me.
still reading? you must not have anything to do. two cups of coffee down. one to go. and then i'll make breakfast.
michelle and i are planning a nice weekend away. port townsend, i think. we need a quality bed and breakfast.
more
research on the affects of video games on folks. the whole thing is annoying. i like some of the comments. for example, that is a very poorly controlled study. to properly control that study, you need a group that watches tv, a group that doesn't do anything, a group that plays a violent game and then a group that plays a presumed nonviolent game. now compare those folks long term as well as short term. the long term study is a difficult one to do. but without those controls, we don't really know what we're looking at. the issue is pretty overblown anyway. for one thing, TV remains the prefered opiate. but more important than that: there's nothing in those games that we don't accept in movies. stores are happy to sell violent movies. video games? oh, well that's a different story. part of the problem is that there's a perception that video games are for kids. the reality is that (1) kids under 18 aren't allowed to buy the violent games, (2) the majority of gamers are between ages 25 and 35 (3) old folks are always scared of something. remember what they said about rock and roll? yeah, that didn't really pan out so much, did it? and i'm sure that my generation (although i will remain a voice of reason in all issues) will freak out about something. yeah, kids do play the games at their friends houses or have friends older brothers buy them. but wait, doesn't the same thing happen with movies? oh right, but this is different. of course. shrill hyperbole is what it all is. throw some aimless democrats looking for voters from the right and you have a lot of bullshit being thrown around.